The Long Walk – Book Vs. Movie

Hi all!

Today I am comparing The Long Walk by Stephen King to its film adaptation. The Long Walk was published in 1979, under King’s psuedonym: Richard Bachman. He gave us a game of death of story, long before anyone else did. I finally read it for the first time this year, right before the movie came out. Without further ado, let’s get into it! 

Spoilers Ahead! 


100 teenage boys compete in a deadly annual event, in a dystopian future America. They must walk continuously along a route, maintaining a minimum speed, until only one survivor remains. If a boy falls below the required pace, after receiving three warnings, he is shot and killed by soldiers. The ultimate prize for the sole survivor is to have “whatever he wants”. The story follows protagonist, Ray Garraty, as he navigates this brutal contest, forming bonds and witnessing the unforgiving deaths of his fellow walkers.  


THE LONG WALK – THE BOOK 

The Long Walk is a surprisingly short book. Despite the page count, it packs a real punch. From the beginning, we are introduced to a charismatic group of boys, we know we’re going to have to eventually say goodbye to, one by one. However, that doesn’t make their deaths any easier. To build and maintain tension, there are many close calls in this novel; particulary where Garraty is concerned. He borders on getting his ‘ticket‘ many times, leaving you with your heart in your throat. After all, we are following his perspective and therefore anticipate, he will be the sole victor by the end. The predictability in no way ruins the suspense. It’s still a brutal, ugly competition that doesn’t hold back. I felt nauseated, scared and downright disturbed. Having said that, I do think the story becomes reptitive. There were only so many ways King could describe the paths taken, the hunger, the pain, the thirst, the sickness and the fear. He did it brilliantly, but the pacing (for want of a better term) felt slow. I kept thinking whilst I was reading it, ‘this would make a much better film.’ I also did not like the ending. It was far too ambiguous for me. Garraty was the last man standing, but he also died? Furthermore, I truly couldn’t understand why 100 boys would volunteer to be part of The Long Walk. It’s not like the Reaping, where the children have no choice. They know they will die. They know only one can win. I needed a stronger motivation, aside from the promise of getting whatever one desires most. What King does well in every single book he writes, is character development. These boys have deep, thought-provoking conversations with another. They form short-lived bonds; making light of the situation, when there’s no light to be found. In particular, McVries, my personal favourite, shows Garraty that beauty exists everywhere you look. I really enjoyed my reading experience and the uncomfortable reactions it evoked from me. Job well done. 

I gave it 3.5/5 stars


50 teens participate in a grueling high-stakes contest, where they must continuously walk, or be shot by a member of their military escort.


THE LONG WALK – THE MOVIE

The Long Walk made a much better film (in my opinion). There were some creative decisions I really appreciated. For one, it was directed by the perfect man. Francis Lawrence directed all The Hunger Games films (aside from the first one), including Sunrise on the Reaping. What better person to tackle a game of death story? He really brought Stephen King’s vision to life. He also didn’t cut corners with the brutality. This movie is rated R for good reason. We, as viewers, witness gore, bodilly fluids, splatter and more. It was honestly the best decision the production team could’ve made. Why shy away from the realities of a competition like this? It was disgusting and hard to watch at times, which was the point. Secondly, they reduced the number of participants from 100 to 50. I thought that a great choice. 50 not only gave the boys more motivation to compete (after all, it ups their odds of winning), but it quickens the pace – an issue I had whilst reading the book. It was also easier to keep track of everybody. Thirdly, the movitation behind Garraty‘s participation made a lot more sense to me. In the novel, we learn Garrarty’s father was taken away by the squad. In the movie, we actually see him get shot in front of his son. It’s much more personal. I was able to buy into Ray’s rationale. Finally, what I appreciated the most, out of all the changes made, was the ending. Instead of Garraty being the last man standing, it was my beloved McVriesFrancis Lawrence really fathomed how superior McVries is – played brilliantly by David Jonsson. By the end, McVries shifts his peaceful mentality, to one of revenge. When Garraty sacrificed himself for McVries, he could not accept his friend’s death being for nothing – and so, he chose vengeance over growth. I love this interpretation. It was a lot less ambiguous, proving that the nature of the game will eventually stamp out whatever hope someone has left. It was such a shock watching McVries walk away. Did he end up getting shot for killing The Major? That part was unclear, but either way, I truly respected the decision to alter the ending. It is my preferred conclusion. My one negative was The Major himself. I actually found him more intimidating in the book. Mark Hamill’s portrayal was less believable for me. I do wonder if that was a casting choice, or the way the character was written. Overall, the film adaptation retained the heart and soul of the book. I loved the deep conversations in between the horror and was more invested in the boys, seeing them in person. Some of their deaths cut deep (Olson) and the tension ramped up at the perfect times (i.e. the hill scene, the first death and the ending). It is, without a doubt, going to make my top 5 favourite horror movies of 2025. 

I gave it 4.5/5 stars

IN CONCLUSION 

As expected, I preferred the film over the book. That rarely happens. The book is typically the winner every single time. However, in this case, it just worked so much better on screen. Not to mention, all the issues I struggled with whilst reading, were corrected/changed in the movie. I highly recommend checking out both and making up your own mind. 

Please let me know your thoughts. Do you prefer the movie or the book?

Thanks for reading! Peace & Love xoxo 

One response to “The Long Walk – Book Vs. Movie”

  1. […] winner is the modern remake. It is exactly what The Running Man should be. The irony that this and The Long Walk were both released in the same […]

Leave a Reply

About Me

I’m Rebecca, a creative spirit who loves to read, write, watch horror movies, discuss RuPaul’s Drag Race and fangirl over Taylor Swift!

Welcome to my little corner of the world!

Discover more from My Bookish Universe

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from My Bookish Universe

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading